Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hazard Mater ; 441: 129903, 2023 01 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087528

RESUMO

Microplastics (MP) and nanoplastics (NP) exist in the disposable plastic take-away containers. This study aims to determine the gut and oral microbiota alterations in the individuals frequently and occasionally consuming take-away food in disposable plastic containers (TFDPC), and explore the effect of micro/nanoplastics (MNP) reduction on gut microbiota in mice. TFDPC consumption are associated with greater presences of gastrointestinal dysfunction and cough. Both occasional and frequent consumers have altered gut and oral microbiota, and their gut diversity and evenness are greater than those of non-TFDPC consuming cohort. Multiple gut and oral bacteria are associated with TFDPC consumers, among which intestinal Collinsella and oral Thiobacillus are most associated with the frequent consumers, while intestinal Faecalibacterium is most associated with the occasional consumers. Although some gut bacteria associated with the mice treated with 500 µg NP and 500 µg MP are decreased in the mice treated with 200 µg NP, the gut microbiota of the three MNP groups are all different from the control group. This study demonstrates that TFDPC induces gut and oral microbiota alterations in the consumers, and partial reduction of the size and amount of MNP cannot rectify the MNP-induced gut microbial dysbiosis.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Animais , Disbiose/induzido quimicamente , Camundongos , Microplásticos , Plásticos/toxicidade
2.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol ; 39(2): 43, 2022 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520300

RESUMO

Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum LI09 could prevent D-galactosamine-induced liver injury. Our previous study has preliminarily determined that different intestinal microbiota profiles existed in the LI09-treated rats. Due to the sample size limitation, some subsequent analyses could not be achieved. In the current study, we conducted different experiments and bioinformatic analyses to characterise the distinct intestinal bacterial microbiota profiles in the LI09-treated rats with liver injury (i.e., LI09 group). Partition around medoids clustering analysis determined two intestinal microbiota profiles (i.e., Cluster_1_LI09 and Cluster_2_LI09) in LI09 group. Compared with Cluster_2_LI09, Cluster_1_LI09 group was determined at less dysbiotic microbial status and with lower level of liver injury. The two microbiota profiles were determined with distinct representative amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), among which, ASV1_Akkermansia and ASV3_Bacteroides were most associated with Cluster_1_LI09 and Cluster_2_LI09, respectively. Multiple representative phylotypes in Cluster_1_LI09 negatively correlating with liver function variables were assigned to Parabacteroides, suggesting Parabacteroides could benefit LI09 on modulating the liver function. In addition, ASV310_Lachnospiraceae, ASV501_Muribaculaceae and ASV484_Lachnospiraceae were determined as network gatekeepers in Cluster_1_LI09 network. The relevant results suggest that some intestinal bacteria could assist LI09 in lowering the intestinal microbial dysbiosis in the rats with liver injury, and their clinical application deserves further investigation.


Assuntos
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum , Doença Hepática Crônica Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Ratos , Animais , Galactosamina/toxicidade , Fígado/microbiologia , Disbiose , Bactérias
3.
J Appl Microbiol ; 133(2): 375-384, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365858

RESUMO

AIMS: Liver damage has caused great illness in human beings. Bifidobacterium catenulatum LI10 has been determined with protective effect against D-galactosamine-induced liver damage. However, due to the sample limitation, the individual difference in its protective effect was not determined. The current study was designed to characterize the gut microbiota of LI10-pretreated rats with lower levels of liver damage. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of experiments and bioinformatic analyses were carried out. Two rat cohorts with different levels of liver damage were determined, that is, Non-Severe and Severe cohorts. Six out of the seven measured liver function variables were lower in the Non-Severe cohort, while four cytokine variables also yielded differences between the two cohorts. The Non-Severe and Severe cohorts were determined with distinct gut microbiota, among which ASV14_Parabacteroides and ASV7_Bacteroides were most associated with Non-Severe and Severe cohorts, respectively. Five phylotypes were determined as structural gatekeepers in the microbiota network of Non-Severe cohort, ASV135_Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 of which contributed most to the stability of the network. CONCLUSIONS: The relevant findings suggest that some gut bacteria could benefit the protective effect of LI10 on lowering the severity of rat liver damage. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The bacteria benefiting the protective effects of potential probiotics could be further investigated for future clinical application.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Probióticos , Animais , Bifidobacterium , Galactosamina/farmacologia , Humanos , Fígado , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Ratos
4.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 8647483, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35127946

RESUMO

Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum LI09 could protect rats from D-galactosamine- (D-GalN-) induced liver injury. However, individual difference in the protective effects of LI09 on the liver injury remains poorly understood. The present study is aimed at determining the multiple intestinal bacteria associated with the better protective effect of LI09 against D-GalN-induced rat liver injury. Two rat cohorts, i.e., the nonsevere and severe cohorts, were divided based on their liver injury severity. Higher level of ALB and lower levels of ALT, AST, TBA, TB, IL-5, and MIP-3α were determined in the nonsevere cohort than the severe cohort. The alpha diversity indices (i.e., observed species, Shannon, and Pielou indices) did not yield significant differences between the intestinal microbiota of the nonsevere and severe cohorts. The intestinal microbiota composition was different between the two cohorts. Ten phylotypes assigned to Bacteroides, Clostridia_UCG-014, Clostridium Lachnospiraceae, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136, and Parabacteroides were closely associated with the nonsevere cohort, among which, ASV8_Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 was the most associated one. At the structure level, two groups of phylotypes with most correlations were determined in the intestinal microbiota networks of the two cohorts. Among them, ASV135_Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 was the most powerful gatekeeper in the microbiota network of the nonsevere cohort. In conclusion, some intestinal bacteria, e.g., Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136, Parabacteroides, and Clostridium, were associated with the better protective effect of LI09 against D-GalN-induced rat liver injury. They were likely to enhance the effectiveness of LI09, and their clinical application deserves further investigation.


Assuntos
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Animais , Galactosamina/farmacologia , Humanos , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Fígado , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...